The Issues That Matter

Housing & Affordability

Ending Street Homelessness

Reform of the Tri-City Animal Shelter

It’s Your City.
Expect More.

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Cover for Pasco City Councilman Leo Perales
6,549
Pasco City Councilman Leo Perales

Pasco City Councilman Leo Perales

Leo Perales is your District 3 Councilman for the great city of Pasco.
Its Your City. Expect More.

Opinions are my own and don’t represent my employer or the city of Pasco.

🚨 WE WORKED TOO HARD TO GO BACKWARDS. 🚒

One of my serious concerns with the proposed cuts to the Pasco Fire Department is what they could mean for our WSRB Protection Class 3 rating. Our firefighters and Fire Department have worked for years to get us to this point, and that rating didn’t happen by accident. Pasco’s Fire Master Plan specifically identified maintaining our Class 3 rating as something that required continued attention and improvement, and in 2024, the Fire Department successfully maintained that Class 3 rating.

Now we’re talking about potentially cutting firefighters, taking fire engines out of service, and reducing or closing fire station operations. I believe we need to take very seriously whether cuts of this magnitude could put our rating in jeopardy. WSRB evaluates factors such as firefighter staffing, engine companies, apparatus, station distribution, training, and a community’s overall fire-response capabilities. Those are some of the very resources we are now discussing cutting.

We should not spend years investing in additional stations, equipment, personnel, and training to strengthen fire protection, only to turn around and dismantle pieces of that system when the budget gets difficult. We worked too hard to get here to start going backwards now.

There is also another potential consequence our residents and businesses deserve to understand. WSRB protection classifications can be used by insurance companies as one factor in determining property insurance rates. That makes this bigger than simply looking at how much money can be removed from a department’s budget.

Before we eliminate firefighter positions, take engines out of service, or reduce station coverage, I want an answer to a very simple question: What will these cuts do to Pasco’s Class 3 WSRB rating? Council should have that answer before, not after, we make decisions that could be difficult and expensive to reverse.

Our Fire Department and our firefighters have worked too hard to get us to this point. We should be building on that progress, not undoing it.

🚒 PUBLIC SAFETY IS PARAMOUNT. SUPPORT PASCO’S FIREFIGHTERS.
... See MoreSee Less

🚨 WE WORKED TOO HARD TO GO BACKWARDS. 🚒

One of my serious concerns with the proposed cuts to the Pasco Fire Department is what they could mean for our WSRB Protection Class 3 rating. Our firefighters and Fire Department have worked for years to get us to this point, and that rating didn’t happen by accident. Pasco’s Fire Master Plan specifically identified maintaining our Class 3 rating as something that required continued attention and improvement, and in 2024, the Fire Department successfully maintained that Class 3 rating.

Now we’re talking about potentially cutting firefighters, taking fire engines out of service, and reducing or closing fire station operations. I believe we need to take very seriously whether cuts of this magnitude could put our rating in jeopardy. WSRB evaluates factors such as firefighter staffing, engine companies, apparatus, station distribution, training, and a community’s overall fire-response capabilities. Those are some of the very resources we are now discussing cutting.

We should not spend years investing in additional stations, equipment, personnel, and training to strengthen fire protection, only to turn around and dismantle pieces of that system when the budget gets difficult. We worked too hard to get here to start going backwards now.

There is also another potential consequence our residents and businesses deserve to understand. WSRB protection classifications can be used by insurance companies as one factor in determining property insurance rates. That makes this bigger than simply looking at how much money can be removed from a department’s budget.

Before we eliminate firefighter positions, take engines out of service, or reduce station coverage, I want an answer to a very simple question: What will these cuts do to Pasco’s Class 3 WSRB rating? Council should have that answer before, not after, we make decisions that could be difficult and expensive to reverse.

Our Fire Department and our firefighters have worked too hard to get us to this point. We should be building on that progress, not undoing it.

🚒 PUBLIC SAFETY IS PARAMOUNT. SUPPORT PASCO’S FIREFIGHTERS.

Comment on Facebook

Hear something to think about: our property (home / residential), commercial and industrial insurance coverage will increase if the PFD is reduced. Reducing the PPD would most likely mean increased criminal activity. Which would mean that your property insurance rates would increase.

The fire protection rating is very real for homeowners insurance rates. I live in a donut hole of Pasco and my insurance agent has told me that our homeowners insurance will go down if we are ever annexed into the city. That insurance impact could be quantified so citizens are well informed of the trade offs for cutting services vs. maintaining and paying higher taxes.

I very much agree yet let’s be honest people the jobs and agencies are union, like them or not is irrelevant but what is relevant is how much more money this costs the Citizens.

The previous Chief Bob Gear worked hard to get Pasco Fire to its current WSRB and a respectable Fire agency. The current Fire Chief was a big mistake and just not in control of managing a Fire agency.

Load more

It's your city.
Expect more.

Support the campaign today!

*Opinions expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer.